Folks,
Here is a profile of Justice Shiv Narain Dhingra of the Delhi High Court.
Justice Dhingra ended the extortion racket known as Section 498A/IPC in National Capital Region (NCR) through his judgments, starting with the Smt Neera Singh (Verify Income Tax) judgment of 2007.
He ranks amongst the great judges to grace any Indian Court.
Below are a collection of his important judgments related to domestic issues such as 498A, CrPC 125 and the DV Act:
The Judgments Of Justice Shiv Narain Dhingra, Delhi HC
It looks like he gets the difficult cases as well:
- http://in.news.yahoo.com/061228/48/6anpt.html
- http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2579093.stm
- http://www.sikhsundesh.net/genocide.htm
- http://www.financialexpress.com/print.php?content_id=144876
- http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Delhi/Road_rage_HC_calls_for_deterrence/articleshow/2274841.cms
Justice Dhingra ruled in a case relating to the carnage in 1984.
Here is an excerpt of his judgment
THE Carnage Justice Committee (CJC) set up for the riot victims cites Tyagi’s case as an example of how easy it was for some police officials to escape punishment. The members of the CJC quote the landmark judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, Justice S.N. Dhingra. In his judgment Justice Dhingra said: “The then SHO Shoor Veer Singh Tyagi showed his shoorvirta by getting the innocent persons killed. His successor Satvir Singh Rathi showed his ‘love for truth’ by suppressing the truth and eliminating whatever possible evidence against the culprits that could be eliminated. Other police officials of Kalyanpuri faithfully followed their instructions for not taking any action.”
There is yet another reason that I say that he is great.
Indira Jaising, the famed Indian Feminazi, led a campaign to smear him and intimidate him.
She also wrote silly articles attacking justice Dhingra such as ‘It was a crime that I was born a woman’.
Here is a video of the Afzal case on youtube where she is seen defaming him.
This Feminazi now finds her rear end kicked all over the Internet for attacking and attempting to intimidate this noble judge, by bloggers affected by the BS she has been peddling.
Here is another aspect of the coordinated attack on Justice Dhingra:
“There was a small group of citizens, including veteran socialists, civil liberties activists and democratic Indians who were deeply concerned over the fact that the new anti-terrorist law made it virtually impossible for any accused to prove his innocence. And they believed Geelani when he said he was innocent. The challenge before this small but committed group of Indian citizens was how to turn public opinion – to make people aware of the dangers of convicting people merely on the basis of police suspicion, without a fair trial, and to create a climate where the life and liberty of a fellow citizen could not be sacrificed at the altar of national chauvinism. This appeared an impossible task even when some of the country’s most prominent citizens formed themselves into the All India Committee for the Defence of S.A.R. Geelani. We will leave it to history to judge whether Geelani and the other three accused were given a fair trial in the designated court. In the defence committee’s view the judge, S.N. Dhingra, made no effort to mask his prejudice, forcing teachers of Delhi and Jawaharlal Nehru University to write an open letter to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to ensure a fair trial for Geelani.”
Nandita Haksar says: “There was a small group of citizens, including veteran socialists, civil liberties activists and democratic Indians who were deeply concerned over the fact that the new anti-terrorist law made it virtually impossible for any accused to prove his innocence.”
And I ask her where these bleeding heart citizens, socialists and random junta are, when women and children are being arrested under 498A with no chance given to prove their innocence. The accused in the Parliament attack got out faster than those falsely implicated in a 498A case.
I dedicate this blog to Justice Dhingra.
____________________________________________
In four years since the case was fild by the Gulati’s for quashing of FIR no other judge quashed it till now. My papers are speaking for themselves the 340 petition i had filed clearly stated it all. did not matter to Judge Dhingra. Also if the gulati’s had been asked to provide the execution of the judgment dated march 31, 1999 . Gulati lawyer SS gandhi would have his pants on fire trying to prove their innocence.
why would it matter to a judge if justice was done or not? There is a famous american saying. what goes around comes around. one will reap what you have sown in this life. may be now, me in the next birth. Twenty days afer coming on tis case justice dhingra passed a judgment. my 14 years ofexcruciating pain got complied in 4 pages. you are truly a land mark judge.i only can hope that you find a judge like yourself in your next life on your case. and may you be born a woman with a husband like anuranjan gulati.
A LANDMARK ORDER/JUDGEMENT ON ISSUE OF MAINTENANCE : LOGICAL & IN THE INTEREST OF NATURAL JUSTICE. MANY MANY THANKS, SIR.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CM(M) 1153/2008
KAVITA PRASAD …..
Petitioner
Through: Mr. S.D. Singh, Adv.
versus
RAM ASHRAY PRASAD ….. Respondent
Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
O R D E R
01.10.2008
The petitioner who is an MBBS qualified Doctor and admittedly had
been in practice before, claims that she was sitting at home despite being a
qualified Doctor and does not work. The petitioner claimed maintenance against
her husband who is in service. The Trial Court granted maintenance of
Rs.4,000/- per month. This petition is made against observation of the Trial
Court that she was working somewhere and earning around Rs.8,000 to 10,000/- PM
and that the maintenance granted by the Trial Court was made subject to
adjustment of the maintenance being received by her under Section 125.
Since counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner is not
working anywhere, despite being a qualified Doctor, I consider that as she is
receiving maintenance from husband, the Court should not allow her experience
and qualification to go waste. I consider that she should be directed to work as
a honorary Doctor in some public welfare institute or school free of charges
where she can take care of health of the poor people.
Let her come to Court and give an undertaking that she was
prepared to work without charging anything in any institution named by this
Court around her house minimum 5 hours a day and 6 days a week, so long she
receives maintenance from her husband on the plea of being unemployed.
List on 23rd October, 2008.
SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA,J
OCTOBER 01, 2008
ak
i.35
sir,this is ajay kapahi.i own a piece of land in palam new delhi possessed by tenants.i need to know your new judgement regarding illegal tenanats.
Respected
Justice S N Dhingra,
I want to have advice from you that how can we prove the women wrong who files false 498A case against their in-laws.I need this advice as my brother’s wife has filed a false case against our family recently so if you can advice how we can protect ourselves and also we want to fight against it so what should we do.
Thanks and Regards
P.Sharma
Hi ,
i got married last year and just after three months of marriage my wife started staying with my inlawas , without my knowlege she was financing my inlaws family, she was repaying thier loans and also she funded their second daughters marriage , i had no probs with this but i an upset with the fact that she hide all this from me and my family, when i asked her for the bank statement to confirm my doubt she and my inlwas started making false alegations on me and my family for asking dowry and harrassment, my parents and me are innocent we never even raised our voice over her, she is doing this to tak the attention away from her fraud.
she has not yet filed any case , but from her mailes it looks like she is planning to do that soon , can anybody help me so that i can save muself and my faamily from all this.