Understanding HC Quash Petitions: Section 482 Of CrPC

The definitive guidelines under which a High Court can exercise its authority to quash a petition is given by the Supreme Court in the Bhajan Las Vs State Of Haryana, 21/11/1990, judgment. This judgment lays the ground rules for a HC to quash a criminal case.

Here is the link to the judgment from Judis:

http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/qrydisp.aspx?filename=7332
OR

SC: HCs Have To Be Cautious In ‘Dowry’ Cases

The best explanation of the view of the courts, in my opinion, has been given by Justice Dhingra.

This is what he says:

“While exercising powers under Section 482 of the Cr. P.C. the Court has to keep in mind that it should not ordinarily embark upon an enquiry whether the evidence in question is reliable or not or whether on a reasonable appreciation of it accusation would not be sustained. This is a function of the Trial Court. Though the judicial process should not be an instrument of oppression or needless harassment but the Court should be circumspect and judicious in exercising discretion and should take all relevant facts and circumstances in consideration before issuing process under Section 482 lest the Section becomes an instrument in the hands of accused persons to claim differential treatment only because the accused persons can spend money to approach higher forums. This Section is not an instrument handed over to an accused to short circuit a prosecution and bring about its sudden death. “

Here is the document that attempts to explain HC Quash Petitions (Section 482):

Understanding HC Quash Petitions: Section 482 Of CrPC

_____________________________________

4 Responses to “Understanding HC Quash Petitions: Section 482 Of CrPC”


  1. 1 Ravi December 14, 2007 at 4:00 pm

    Very good post Vinayak. This should help many victims understanding the timing of the filing the Quash petitions.

  2. 2 KUMAR February 2, 2008 at 3:01 pm

    KIND ATTN:

    MY CASE IS ON TRIAL IN 498A FATHER DIED DUE TO THIS HARRASEMENT WAS PUT BEHIND BARS FOR NOTHING WAS AN HEART PATIENT MOTHER AND BROTHER TOO WERE SENT TO JAIL I GOT ANTICIPATORY HAVE SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO NOT PROVE GUILTY LIKE VOICE RECORDING,FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ETC.
    HAVE TWO KIDS SHE WANTS TO COME BACK.
    KINDLY SUGGEST REMIDIES. KIDS R GIVEN TO ME HIGH COURT.
    DO MY BANK STATEMENTS AND EXPENDITURE BILLS HAVE WEIGHT ON MY SIDE.
    KUMAR.

  3. 3 Gupta February 13, 2008 at 11:52 pm

    I feel sorry after reading your post. Did you try for quashing of FIR in the High Court? All the evidence you have, will definitely help you to win the case.
    Good luck!!
    Gupta

  4. 4 manas May 15, 2008 at 10:21 am

    Sir my brother’s wife committed suicide (was confimed by forensic report also). My brother’s in-laws lodged 498a case against him The death was within 7 years of marriage.

    Recently, his in-laws have supported us and said they will fully cooperate with us .

    The proceeding of the case will start in lower court from 25th June 2008.

    Pl advise how my brother’s in-laws can favour us so that the judgement is in favour of us.

    pl. help me… and guide us

Leave a Reply




Visitors Since Mar/14/07

  • 196,111

Click The Links Below For:

Some Interesting Stats On Arrests Of Women

In 1930, the British govt arrested 17,000 women for their involvement in the Dandi Yatra (Salt March). During 1937 to 1947 (10 Years), they arrested 5,000 women involved in the freedom struggle. From 2004 to 2006, the govt of India arrested 90,000 women of all ages under 498A. On the average, 27,000 women per year are being arrested under this flawed law. These are stats from the NCRB.

Copyright Notice:

The content of this blog is copyrighted. You are required to obtain prior permission before locally hosting or reproducing online or in print, any or part of the content. You are welcome to directly link to the content from your site. Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape MyFreeCopyright.com Registered & Protected Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.

Get Adobe Acrobat Reader

You will need adobe acrobat to read most of the documents. Please download adobe acrobat reader. Get Adobe Acrobat For Your System

Archives

Disclaimer:

The family of the writer was tortured by the Indian Police in an attempt to extort a huge amount of money by holding them hostage. They were held in custody for over a week. The police, in cahoots with the magistrate and the PP, could do this due to the ridiculous allegations made by his embittered ex-wife. She filed the 498A years after the last time he and his family had last seen her. This blog was started to combat the abuses perpetrated in the name of laws meant to protect women, such as S.498A of IPC. It is the corrupt officers of the Indian police force who are the main beneficiaries of this extortion racket. In a sense, this blog is a component in the larger battle against corruption in India. This is about raising the awareness of Indian citizens about their rights so that the police can be shown their place and the law can take the course it is supposed to take. The content of this blog is not legal advice, nor is the intent to slander or defame anyone or any institution, but constitute a set of opinions and observations, based on what has been read or heard in the media or on the Internet and other sources of information. What ever action or umbrage you may take or not take, is your choice and at your risk. The writer disclaims all liabilities, legal or otherwise, that may arise for any reason whatsoever.

Cluster Map

Geo Maps