Delay in Filing an FIR Can Lead to an Acquittal

I was looking this judgment for a while as the FIR against me was filed two years after I allegedly harassed my ex-wife over the phone for dowry !

This snippet from another judgment (click on the text for the judgment) reinforces my contention that my family and I were dragged into this mess to extort money:

9. Prompt and early reporting of the occurrence by the informant with all its vivid details gives an assurance regarding its true version. In case, there is some delay in filing the FIR, the complainant must give explanation for the same. Undoubtedly, delay in lodging the FIR does not make the complainant’s case improbable when such delay is properly explained. However, deliberate delay in lodging the complaint may prove to be fatal. In such case of delay, it also cannot be presumed that the allegations were an after thought or had given a coloured version of events. The court has to carefully examine the facts before it, for the reason, that the complainant party may initiate criminal proceedings just to harass the other side with mala fide intentions or with ulterior motive of wreaking vengeance. The court proceedings ought not to be permitted to degenerate into a weapon of harassment and persecution. In such a case, where an FIR is lodged clearly with a view to spite the other party because of a private and personal grudge and to enmesh the other party in long and arduous criminal proceedings, the court may take a view that it amounts to an abuse of the process of law. (Vide: Sahib Singh v. State of Haryana, AIR 1997 SC 3247; G. Sagar Suri & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Ors., AIR 2000 SC 754; Gorige Pentaiah v. State of A.P. & Ors., (2008) 12 SCC 531; and Kishan Singh (dead) thr. Lrs. v. Gurpal Singh & Ors., AIR 2010 SC 3624)

Now that I know what to look for, I’ll upload these judgments later.

Here is excerpt from this judgment detailing how higher courts view delays in filing a FIRs:

19.In the present case, as noted supra, First Information Report in regard to the alleged occurrence on 19th April, 1996 was lodged on 22nd May, 1996. Admittedly after her discharge from the hospital on 22nd April, 1996, the complainant went to her parents’ house and resided there. In her testimony, the complainant has deposed that since no one from the family of the accused came to enquire about her welfare, she decided to lodge the First Information Report. No explanation worth the name for delay in filing the complaint with the police has come on record. We are of the opinion that this circumstance raises considerable doubt regarding the genuineness of the complaint and the veracity of the evidence of the complainant (PW-1) and her father (PW-3), rendering it unsafe to base the conviction of the respondent upon it. Resultantly, when the substratum of the evidence given by the complainant (PW-1) is found to be unreliable, the prosecution case has to be rejected in its entirety.

For the moment, here’s the judgment which is the subject of this post.

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

(Arising out of S.L.P. (Criminal) No. 3426 of 2007)

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH                –   APPELLANT (S)

VERSUS

  1. M. MADHUSUDHAN RAO                     –   RESPONDENT (S)

D.K. JAIN, J.: Leave granted.

2.Being aggrieved by the judgment and final order dated 12th April, 2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad, setting aside the conviction of the respondent-accused A-1 in Sessions Case No.129 of 1998 from the charge of offence punishable under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short `I.P.C.’) and acquitting him, the State of Andhra Pradesh has preferred this appeal.

3.Brief facts, necessary for the disposal of the appeal, are as follows:

Marriage between the de facto complainant (PW-1) and the respondent (A-1) was solemnized on 24th November, 1993. On 22nd May, 1996, the complainant sent a report (Ex.P-1) to the Additional D.G.P., CID, Hyderabad, inter alia, alleging that at the time of her marriage with A-1, on the insistence of A-1 and his mother (A-2), her father gave her one house, Rs.60,000/- in cash, six tolas of gold and household articles worth Rs.50,000/-. Still after the marriage, her husband, working as Reserve Sub-Inspector (RSP) at Security Printing Press, was pressurising her to bring Rs.50,000/- more; he used to beat her up, scold, shout and threaten to kill her and on certain occasions he had also pressed her neck saying that he would kill her. It was also alleged that her mother-in-law (A-2), her husband’s brother Prabhakar and his wife (A-4), and the second sister-in-law of her husband (A-3) and her husband’s last brother also used to help her husband in beating and harassing her. It was further alleged that one Mrs. Jalaja, working as Telephone Operator in the Reserve Bank of India, also used to threaten her by saying that her husband (A-1) had married her and he did not like to stay with her. Branding her husband to be a gambler, drunkard and moving around with anti social elements, it was also alleged that about six months back her husband and his family members had made the first attempt to eliminate her by forcibly pouring poison into her throat and when her condition became serious, they informed her parents that she had taken poison. However, then she had not made any complaint to the police against her husband. But again on 19th April, 1996 at 11.00 a.m., her husband (A-1), his mother (A-2), his second brother’s wife (A-3) and her husband’s third brother’s wife (A-4) forced her to consume poison and as a result thereof she was admitted in the nursing home at about 2.30 p.m. in an unconscious state. When she was in a semi conscious state, the police took her statement but she did not know what statement the police had recorded. Her husband informed her parents about the incident only in the evening though she was admitted in the hospital at 2.30 p.m.; her parents came later and although they had lodged a complaint with the police but no action was taken against any person. After being discharged from the hospital on 22nd April, 1996, she went to stay with her parents and since then she is staying with them but neither her husband nor his family members have come to see her. As noted supra, the complaint regarding the incident on 19th April, 1996 was lodged on 22nd May, 1996.

4.The complaint was forwarded to the Senior Executive Officer, CID, Hyderabad and consequently on 7th August, 1996 a case was registered against accused A-1 to A-4 as also against the said Mrs. Jalaja under Sections 498-A, 420, 494, 307 I.P.C. After investigation, chargesheet was laid against accused A-1 to A-4 for offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 307 read with Section 34 I.P.C.

5.During the course of trial, the prosecution examined nine witnesses. No evidence was produced in defence. The learned Trial Court, on appreciation of evidence, and relying on the evidence of the father of the complainant (PW-3), nephew of PW-3 (PW-4), a store clerk/colleague of PW-3 (PW-5), Security Inspector/colleague of PW-3 (PW-6), and a neighbour of PW-1 and PW-3 (PW-7), came to the conclusion that all the aforestated items had been given as consideration for the marriage on demand of the accused though in the disguise of being gifts to the bridegroom. The Trial Court also inferred that accused A-1, who had purchased a lorry in the name of the complainant–wife (PW-1) on 6th November, 1995 was harassing her to get Rs.50,000/- from her parents for the purchase of lorry. Inter alia, observing that though no specific instances of harassment had come on record but the long course of conduct of accused A-1 showed that the allegations of harassment were not totally baseless, the trial judge finally found accused A-1 guilty of the offence punishable under Section 498-A I.P.C. and accordingly sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.8000/- with default stipulation. Out of the fine amount, a sum of Rs.6000/- was ordered to be paid to

PW-1. However, he did not find accused A-1 guilty under Section 307 I.P.C. and accordingly acquitted him of the said charge. Accused A-2 to A-4 were not found guilty of both the charges framed against them and were acquitted accordingly.

6.Aggrieved, the respondent (A-1) challenged his conviction by preferring appeal before the High Court. The High Court, as stated above, on a re-appraisal of the entire evidence, has set aside the conviction. Against this judgment, the State of Andhra Pradesh is in appeal before us.

7.We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

8. Mrs. June Chaudhary, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the State vehemently submitted that the High Court has taken an unreasonable view in acquitting the respondent, overlooking his conduct before and after the marriage. It was submitted that the evidence produced by the prosecution clearly proves that even before the marriage, the respondent (A-1) was insisting on transfer of the house in his name; even on the date of marriage demand for money was made and though the lorry was purchased in the name of the complainant, it was not by way of any love and affection but to extract more money from her parents. Learned counsel, thus, argued that in the light of these surrounding circumstances, a clear case for conviction under Section 498-A I.P.C. had been made out against the respondent.

9.Mr. R. Venkatramani, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent, while supporting the view taken by the High Court, submitted that the High Court having re-appreciated and carefully analyzed the entire evidence before reaching the conclusion that no case for conviction of the respondent had been made out, this Court should be loathe to exercise its jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution. It was argued that apart from the fact that in the light of the evidence on record no illegality can be attributed to the conclusion recorded by the High Court, even otherwise, it is well settled principle of law that where on an appraisal of the evidence, adduced in the case, the court below has taken a plausible view, the appellate court should not interfere, particularly with an order of acquittal, even if different view can possibly be taken. In support of the proposition, reliance was placed on the decisions of this Court in Harbans Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Punjab1; Shri Gopal & Anr. Vs.Subhash & Ors.2, State of M.P. Vs. Sanjay Rai3, Vijaybhai Bhanabhai Patel Vs. Navnitbhai Nathubhai Patel & Ors.4 and State of Goa Vs. Sanjay Thakran & Anr.5

10.In order to appreciate the rival stands, it would be useful to notice the statutory provisions. Section 498-A I.P.C. makes “cruelty” by husband or his relative a punishable offence. The word “cruelty” is defined in the Explanation appended to the said Section. Section 498-A I.P.C. with Explanation reads thus: “498A. Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty.–Whoever,being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.

Explanation-For the purpose of this section,”cruelty” means–

(a) Any wilful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman; or

(b) harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her meet such demand.”

11.Thus, providing a new dimension to the concept of “cruelty”, clause (a) of Explanation to Section 498-A I.P.C. postulates that any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive a woman to commit suicide would constitute “cruelty”. Such willful conduct, which is likely to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman would also amount to “cruelty”. Clause (b) of the Explanation provides that harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand, would also constitute “cruelty” for the purpose of Section 498-A I.P.C. It is plain that as per clause (b) of the Explanation, which, according to learned counsel for the State, is attracted in the instant case, every harassment does not amount to “cruelty” within the meaning of Section 498-A I.P.C. The definition stipulates that the harassment has to be with a definite object of coercing the woman or any person related to her to meet an unlawful demand. In other words, for the purpose of Section 498-A I.P.C. harassment simpliciter is not “cruelty” and it is only when harassment is committed for the purpose of coercing a woman or any other person related to her to meet an unlawful demand for property etc., that it amounts to “cruelty” punishable under Section 498-A I.P.C.

12.Having noticed the basic ingredients which are required to be proved in order to bring home an offence under Section 498-A I.P.C., at this juncture, we may also briefly note the general principles to be kept in view by the appellate court while dealing with an appeal against acquittal.

13.There is no embargo on the appellate court to review, reappreciate or reconsider the evidence upon which the order of acquittal is founded. Yet, generally, the order of acquittal is not interfered with because the presumption of innocence, which is otherwise available to an accused under the fundamental principles of criminal jurisprudence that every person shall be presumed to be innocent unless he is proved guilty by a court of law, gets further reinforced and strengthened by his acquittal. It is also trite that if two views are possible on the evidence adduced in the case and the one favourable to the accused has been taken by the trial court, it should not be disturbed. Nevertheless, where the approach of the lower court in considering the evidence in the case is vitiated by some manifest illegality or the conclusion recorded by the court below is such which could not have been possibly arrived at by any court acting reasonably and judiciously and is, therefore, liable to the characterised as perverse, then, to prevent miscarriage of justice, the appellate court is obliged to interfere.

14.All these principles have been succinctly culled out by one of us (C.K. Thakker, J.) in Chandrappa & Ors. Vs. State of Karnataka6.

15.Bearing the aforestated broad principles in mind and having bestowed our anxious consideration to the facts at hand, in our judgment, the High Court has not committed any error in dealing with the evidence, which could be said to be patently illegal or that the conclusion reached at by it is wholly untenable, warranting our interference.

16.Though it is true the Trial Court has observed that there is some evidence on record to show that there was a demand for dowry even at the time of marriage but it is clear that the foundation for action against the respondent was laid when the complaint was lodged by the wife on 22nd May, 1996 and the prosecution machinery was set into motion. Again it is true that in the complaint there is a reference to the past conduct of the respondent and his family members but from the tenor of the complaint, it is clear that the allegation of harassment including the alleged poisoning incident is linked solely with her failure to get an additional amount of Rs.50,000/- from her parents for the purchase of lorry. Furthermore, though the Trial Court records that in the evidence there are no specific instances of harassment, yet it has proceeded to presume that long course of conduct of the respondent is indicative of the fact that the allegation of harassment is not totally baseless. Even the deposit of initial amount of Rs.1,50,000/- by the respondent for the purchase of lorry in the name of the complainant has been doubted by the Trial Court. It is pertinent to note that in so far as the allegation of poisoning by the accused to kill the complainant is concerned, the Trial Court has found the evidence of PW-3 –the father of the complainant (PW-1) to PW-7 to be unreliable and has rejected the version of the prosecution to that extent. Adversely commenting on the conduct of PW-3, the Trial Court has also observed that none of the accused attempted to escape after the incident which corroborates the anxiety of accused A-1 to A-4 about the life of the complainant. Rejecting the prosecution version based on the complaint, accused A-2 to A-4 were acquitted by the Trial Court. In the light of these circumstances, the learned Judge of the High Court entertained grave doubts about the correctness of the prosecution story.

17.Analysing and re-appreciating the entire evidence threadbare, in particular the testimony of the complainant (PW-1) and her father (PW-3), the learned Judge has observed that though as per her complaint (Ex.P-1), the respondent had been pressurising her to bring Rs.50,000/- as additional dowry for purchase of lorry but her version was not supported even by her father (PW-3). The learned Judge, on an analysis of the entire evidence, reached the conclusion that there is no direct evidence, other than the self-serving testimony of PW-1 regarding alleged beatings or scolding; if really the version of PW-1 that all the accused attempted to kill her by forcibly pouring poison in her mouth, not once but twice, she would not have kept quiet without reporting the matter to the police; even after the second incident she kept quiet for a period of one month; the contents of the complaint clearly showed that PW-1 (the complainant) wanted to see that the respondent loses his job in the police department and that merely because PW-1 attempted to commit suicide, it cannot be presumed that only on account of harassment or cruelty meted out to her that she made an attempt to commit suicide. Taking all these circumstances into consideration, the learned Judge held that it was not safe to rely on the evidence of PW-1, more so, when her relations with the husband were very much strained and, therefore, the Trial Court ought to have given benefit of doubt to the respondent also while acquitting accused A-2 to A-4.

18.Having gone through the depositions of PW-1 and PW-3, to which our attention was invited by learned counsel for the State, we are convinced that in the light of the overall evidence, analysed by the High Court, the order of acquittal of the respondent is well merited and does not call for interference, particularly when the First Information Report was lodged by the complainant more than one month after the alleged incident of forcible poisoning. Time and again, the object and importance of prompt lodging of the First Information Report has been highlighted. Delay in lodging the First Information Report, more often than not, results in embellishment and exaggeration, which is a creature of an afterthought. A delayed report not only gets bereft of the advantage of spontaneity, the danger of the introduction of coloured version, exaggerated account of the incident or a concocted story as a result of deliberations and consultations, also creeps in, casting a serious doubt on its veracity. Therefore, it is essential that the delay in lodging the report should be satisfactorily explained.

19.In the present case, as noted supra, First Information Report in regard to the alleged occurrence on 19th April, 1996 was lodged on 22nd May, 1996. Admittedly after her discharge from the hospital on 22nd April, 1996, the complainant went to her parents’ house and resided there. In her testimony, the complainant has deposed that since no one from the family of the accused came to enquire about her welfare, she decided to lodge the First Information Report. No explanation worth the name for delay in filing the complaint with the police has come on record. We are of the opinion that this circumstance raises considerable doubt regarding the genuineness of the complaint and the veracity of the evidence of the complainant (PW-1) and her father (PW-3), rendering it unsafe to base the conviction of the respondent upon it. Resultantly, when the substratum of the evidence given by the complainant (PW-1) is found to be unreliable, the prosecution case has to be rejected in its entirety.

20.For the foregoing reasons, we are of the opinion that the judgment of the High Court, acquitting the respondent, does not suffer from any infirmity, warranting our interference. The appeal is devoid of any merit and is dismissed accordingly.

( C.K. THAKKER)

( D.K. JAIN)

NEW DELHI,OCTOBER 24, 2008.

_______________________________

About these ads

44 Responses to “Delay in Filing an FIR Can Lead to an Acquittal”


  1. 1 PURMA SRINIVAS May 14, 2012 at 3:34 am

    this judgement more useful in AP state due to some trail courts are looking in our own courts followed

  2. 2 build a gaming pc April 12, 2014 at 6:49 pm

    Hi there are using WordPress for your blog platform?
    I’m new to the blog world but I’m trying to get started and create my own.
    Do you require any html coding knowledge to make your own
    blog? Any help would be really appreciated!

  3. 3 natural joint pain July 7, 2014 at 11:18 pm

    This post iss really a good one iit helps new interenet visitors, wwho are
    wishuing in favor oof blogging.

  4. 4 orlando home inspection July 9, 2014 at 12:33 am

    I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post
    was good. I do not know who you are but certainly you are going to a famous blogger if you aren’t
    already ;) Cheers!

  5. 5 disney lion king coloring page July 13, 2014 at 7:20 am

    Remarkable! Its in fact amazing piece of writing,
    I have got much clear idea concerning from this paragraph.

  6. 6 private investigator kit July 16, 2014 at 4:51 am

    I have read so many articles regarding the blogger lovers
    however this piesce of writing is actually a pleasant
    paragraph, keep it up.

  7. 7 http://Www.trilloapp.com August 1, 2014 at 1:12 pm

    Greetings from Carolina! I’m bored to tears at work so I decided to check out your website on my iphone during lunch break.
    I enjoy the info you present here and can’t
    wait to take a look when I get home. I’m shocked at
    how quick your blog loaded on my phone .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G ..
    Anyways, good site!

  8. 8 http://juegosdedoctora.org/profile/bedeniehy.html August 4, 2014 at 5:46 pm

    Engineers, oil workers, salesmen, financial experts, nurses, teachers
    and builders have been in three major car accidents in my life — two
    of my own making and a passenger, and half of
    Mexico. After contacting Swiftcover, he was shocked to discover just how difficult it is cheap car insurance for young drivers – http://juegosdedoctora.org/profile/bedeniehy.html – for
    anyone to beat a nicotine addiction. Hands free is the
    way to the office, but they admit that they have recently
    had a policy cancelled.

  9. 9 pregnancy test prices August 27, 2014 at 12:11 am

    They may provide a positive pregnancy test, and you are pregnant,
    the pregnancy pregnancy rate kits. If you get a pregnancy.
    It’s just too big of a medical doctor and his favorite article he’s worked on has been a healthy baby.

    I stayed pregnancy rate healthy You will be cleared.
    There is still a positive and presence of hCG to help maintain your
    collagen elastin. The hormones present in the lining
    of uterus, you’re dripping pee AHHH!

  10. 10 well-known finest-vendor magnetic August 31, 2014 at 4:45 pm

    Hi just wanted to give you a quick heads up and let you know a few of the images
    aren’t loading correctly. I’m not sure why
    but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different internet browsers
    and both show the same outcome.

  11. 11 Minneapolis divorce attorney reviews September 2, 2014 at 6:08 am

    I usually do nnot comment, however I looked at a bunch oof responses here Delay inn Filing an FIR Can Lead to ann
    Acquittal | IPC 498A. I actually do have 2 questions for you iif you don’t
    mind. Could iit bbe simply me or does it give the impression like a few
    of these comments come across as if they are
    coming ffrom brajn dead folks? :-P And, if youu arre
    posting on additional sites, I would like too follow you.
    Could you post a list of all of your social community sites like your twitter feed, Facebook page or linkedin profile?

  12. 12 glock 22 rear slide plate September 3, 2014 at 3:38 am

    If you desire to increase your knowledge only keep visiting thks
    website and be updated with the newest news update
    posted here.

  13. 13 what is the best electric razor for shaving your head September 3, 2014 at 3:56 am

    Hi it’s me, I am also visiting this site daily,
    this site is actually nice and the visitors are in fact sharing good thoughts.

  14. 14 internet real estate marketing September 9, 2014 at 3:02 am

    Hi there to every one, it’s actually a pleasant for me
    to go to see this web page, it includes useful Information.

  15. 15 Attorney Mississauga September 10, 2014 at 9:07 am

    Hi! This is my first comment here so I just wanted to
    give a quick shout out and say I genuinely enjoy reading your posts.
    Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums that go
    over the same topics? Thank you so much!

  16. 16 S164521232.Onlinehome.Us September 11, 2014 at 10:45 am

    At this moment I am going to do my breakfast, when having my breakfast coming over
    again to read additional news.

  17. 17 www.Instructables.Com September 11, 2014 at 12:58 pm

    Do you mind if I quote a few of your posts as long as I provide
    credit and sources back to your site? My website is
    in the very same niche as yours and my visitors would definitely benefit
    from a lot of the information you provide here.
    Please let me know if this alright with you. Many thanks!

  18. 18 individual retirement account information September 15, 2014 at 1:16 pm

    Definitely believe that which you said. Your
    favorite justification seemed to be on the internet the simplest thing to be aware of.
    I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while people think about worries that they just do not know about.
    You managed to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole thing without having side effect , people could take
    a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thanks

  19. 19 denver seo expert September 15, 2014 at 7:44 pm

    Fantastic post however , I was wondering if you could write
    a litte more on this subject? I’d be very grateful if you could elaborate a little bit more.
    Thank you!

  20. 20 stock market games online September 19, 2014 at 2:28 am

    WOW just what I was searching for. Came here by searching
    for website

  21. 21 seo joo hyun September 20, 2014 at 8:09 am

    My brother suggested I might like this web site. He was totally right.
    This post truly made my day. You can not imagine just how much time
    I had spent for this info! Thanks!

  22. 22 retire September 21, 2014 at 11:26 am

    Do you have a spam problem on this blog; I also am a blogger,
    and I was wondering your situation; many of us have created some
    nice procedures and we are looking to exchange techniques
    with other folks, why not shoot me an email if interested.

  23. 23 rollover retirement September 21, 2014 at 5:40 pm

    I’m gone to say to my little brother, that he should also pay a visit this blog on regular basis to
    get updated from hottest news.

  24. 24 Rolf September 23, 2014 at 7:10 pm

    I know this web page offers quality depending articles or reviews and additional data,
    is there any other website which offers these information in quality?

  25. 25 open a ira account September 24, 2014 at 11:56 am

    Hi there! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give
    a quick shout out and tell you I truly enjoy reading your posts.
    Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that go over the same subjects?
    Appreciate it!

  26. 26 Analisa September 24, 2014 at 8:06 pm

    I was recommended this web site by my cousin. I am not sure whether this post is written by him as no one else know such detailed about my problem.
    You are incredible! Thanks!

  27. 27 Gerda September 24, 2014 at 9:58 pm

    Good web site you have here.. It’s hard to find
    excellent writing like yours these days. I seriously appreciate individuals like you!
    Take care!!

  28. 28 ira questions September 26, 2014 at 11:52 pm

    It’s very trouble-free to find out any matter on net as
    compared to textbooks, as I found this piece of writing at this web page.

  29. 29 website design internet marketing September 29, 2014 at 2:08 am

    Amazing things here. I’m very happy to see your
    article. Thanks a lot and I am having a look ahead to contact you.
    Will you kindly drop me a e-mail?

  30. 30 how to optimize your website for search engines September 30, 2014 at 6:17 am

    I like the valuable info you provide in your articles.

    I will bookmark your blog and check again here regularly.

    I am quite sure I’ll learn many new stuff right here! Best of luck for the
    next!

  31. 31 help making money online October 1, 2014 at 5:10 pm

    Hey There. I discovered your weblog the use of msn. That
    is a very smartly written article. I’ll makee suree to bookmark iit
    and come back to learn extra of your useful information. Thank you
    for the post. I will certainly comeback.

  32. 32 Sanda October 4, 2014 at 11:00 am

    Excellent blog here! Also your site loads up fast! What host are you using?
    Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my
    site loaded up as quickly as yours lol

  33. 33 legitimate way to make money online October 4, 2014 at 9:19 pm

    I do not know whether it’s just me or if perhaps
    everyone else experiencing problems with your site.
    It looks like some of the written text within your posts are running off the screen. Can somebody else please provide
    feedback and let me know if this is happening to
    them too? This might be a issue with my internet browser because I’ve had
    this happen previously. Thank you

  34. 34 guaranteed seo October 5, 2014 at 1:49 pm

    Hi there to every body, it’s my first go to see of this website; this blog contains remarkable and in fact excellent material
    designed for visitors.

  35. 35 septoplasty and rhinoplasty October 8, 2014 at 8:10 pm

    What’s up mates, its enormous piece of writing concerning educationand entirely explained,
    keep it up all the time.


  1. 1 best hosting vps Trackback on June 19, 2014 at 4:55 pm
  2. 2 website coupon code Trackback on July 15, 2014 at 1:47 pm
  3. 3 42 min. full class hatha yoga flow 1 Trackback on August 2, 2014 at 5:52 pm
  4. 4 real housewives of atlanta Trackback on August 11, 2014 at 1:16 pm
  5. 5 slut wife Trackback on August 14, 2014 at 12:55 pm
  6. 6 cheap email marketing Trackback on August 19, 2014 at 3:05 pm
  7. 7 glock siderlock Trackback on August 24, 2014 at 8:55 am
  8. 8 divorce attorney andover mn Trackback on September 18, 2014 at 12:59 pm
  9. 9 personal injury attorney mn Trackback on October 21, 2014 at 9:11 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Visitors Since Mar/14/07

  • 2,247,445

Cluster Map

Live Traffic

Archives

Top Rated Posts

Some Interesting Stats On Arrests Of Women

In 1930, the British govt arrested 17,000 women for their involvement in the Dandi Yatra (Salt March). During 1937 to 1947 (10 Years), they arrested 5,000 women involved in the freedom struggle. From 2004 to 2006, the govt of India arrested 90,000 women of all ages under 498A. On the average, 27,000 women per year are being arrested under this flawed law. These are stats from the NCRB.

Copyright Notice:

The content of this blog is copyrighted. You are required to obtain prior permission before locally hosting or reproducing online or in print, any or part of the content. You are welcome to directly link to the content from your site. Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape MyFreeCopyright.com Registered & Protected Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.

Disclaimer:

The family of the writer was tortured by the Indian Police in an attempt to extort over a $100,000 by holding them in custody for over a week. The police, in cahoots with the magistrate and the PP, did this due to the ridiculous allegations made in a 498A case by his embittered ex-wife. She filed the case years after he and his family had last seen her. Thousands of 498A cases are filed each year in India by women seeking to wreak vengeance on their husbands and in-laws. Enormous sums are extorted from intimidated families implicated in these cases by corrupt Indian police officers and elements of the Indian judiciary. The author and his family haven't bribed any public official nor have they given in to the extortion. This blog aims to raise awareness of due process in India. The content of this blog constitutes, opinions, observations, and publicly available documents. The intent is not to slander or defame anyone or any institution and is the manifestation of the author's right to freedom of expression – with all the protections this right guarantees.

Get Adobe Acrobat Reader

You will need adobe acrobat to read most of the documents. Please download adobe acrobat reader. Get Adobe Acrobat For Your System
November 2011
M T W T F S S
« Oct   May »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 321 other followers

%d bloggers like this: