Archive for March 22nd, 2007

What Is IPC 498A ?

What Is IPC 498A ?

You can get a good idea from here:

Here is some more info compiled by Maksim Gorky. Some links may be inactive.

You can get a good idea about the law here:

    What Is IPC 498A?


    A Possible Reprieve For NRIs On The Run


    Here is a judgment from Justice Dr. Pasayat. I haven’t been able to find the stay order yet, but here is the article from HT: Reprieve For NRI

    There is a strong possibility that you may get the NBWs stayed by applying for a reprieve from the Supreme Court. I am sure that you can pull this off with a 498A as well.

    I will post the orders as soon as I find them.


    The Police Should Always Avoid Arresting A Person: Justice JD Kapoor


    A news item.

    Here is the definitive Judgment by Justice JD Kapoor of the Delhi High Court: The Police Should Avoid Arrest

    You cannot be arrested on the basis of a mere allegation under IPC Sec 498A.

    This is the law of the land and each time the cops arrest you, they are breaking the law and are in contempt of Court. Please have these judments with you if you anticipate a 498A against you. Atleast shield your parents and siblings. I didn’t know and I failed to do so.

    Here is what Justice JD Kapoor says.


    19. It appears that the learned Special Judge was labouring under a misconception that in every non-bailable and cognizable offence the police is required to invariably arrest a person, even if it is not essential for the purpose of investigation.

    20. Rather the law is otherwise. In normal and ordinary course the police should always avoid arresting a person and sending him to jail, if it is possible for the police to complete the investigation without his arrest and if every kind of co-operation i s provided by the accused to the Investigating Officer in completing the investigation. It is only in cases of utmost necessity, where the investigation cannot be completed without arresting the person, for instance, a person may be required for recover of incriminating articles or weapon of offence or for eliciting some information or clue as to his accomplices or any circumstantial evidence, that his arrest may be necessary. Such an arrest may also be necessary if the concerned Investigating Officer or Officer-in-Charge of the Police Station thinks that presence of accused will be difficult to procure because of grave and serious nature of crime as the possibility of his absconding or disobeying the process or fleeing from justice cannot be ruled out.

    21. The liberty of a citizen is of paramount importance and a constitutional guarantee and cannot be incised and therefore the police or Investigating Agencies should not remain under the impression that in every cognizable and ”non-bailable” offence the y should invariably arrest the offender. Power to arrest is altogether different than the need for arrest. Unless a person is required for custodial interrogation and investigation cannot be completed without his arrest, arrest may be necessary. In c se investigation can be completed without his arrest and he extends all kind of co-operation, he should not be arrested. No authority howsoever powerful or mighty can be allowed to deny a person his liberty as it hits at the very foundation of democratic structure. In this regard, I cannot resist the temptation of reproducing the observations made by the Supreme Court in Joginder Kumar vs. State of UP and ors. (1994) 4 SCC 260 which are very pithy and have force in law. These are as under:- ”No arrest can be made because it is lawful for the Police Officer to do so. The existence of the power to arrest is one thing. The justification for the exercise of it is quite another. The Police Officer must be able to justify the arrest apart fro his power to do so. Arrest and detention in police lock-up of a person can cause incalculable harm to the reputation and self-esteem of a person. No arrest can be made in a routine manner on a mere allegation of commission of an offence made against a person. It would be prudent for a Police Officer in the interest of protection of the constitutional rights of a citizen and perhaps in his own interest that no arrest should be made without a reasonable satisfaction reached after some investigation as o the genuineness and bona fides of a complaint and a reasonable belief both as to the person’s complicity and even so as to the need to effect arrest. Denying a person of his liberty is a serious matter.”


    Delhi HC: Go Beyond Prosecutions Case For Truth


    A new judgment from Justice Dhingra.

    Here is the article from HT. I do hope they don’t file charges against me for copyright issues. The idea is to disseminate only: Go Beyond Prosecutions Case For Truth

    Here is the judgment: Surender Kumar Acquitted 498A


    Visitors Since Mar/14/07

    • 3,290,434

    Cluster Map

    Live Traffic


    Top Rated Posts

    Some Interesting Stats On Arrests Of Women

    In 1930, the British govt arrested 17,000 women for their involvement in the Dandi Yatra (Salt March). During 1937 to 1947 (10 Years), they arrested 5,000 women involved in the freedom struggle. From 2004 to 2006, the govt of India arrested 90,000 women of all ages under 498A. On the average, 27,000 women per year are being arrested under this flawed law. These are stats from the NCRB.

    Copyright Notice:

    The content of this blog is copyrighted. You are required to obtain prior permission before locally hosting or reproducing online or in print, any or part of the content. You are welcome to directly link to the content from your site. Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape Registered & Protected Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.


    The family of the writer was tortured by the Indian Police in an attempt to extort over a $100,000 by holding them in custody for over a week. The police, in cahoots with the magistrate and the PP, did this due to the ridiculous allegations made in a 498A case by his embittered ex-wife. She filed the case years after he and his family had last seen her. Thousands of 498A cases are filed each year in India by women seeking to wreak vengeance on their husbands and in-laws. Enormous sums are extorted from intimidated families implicated in these cases by corrupt Indian police officers and elements of the Indian judiciary. The author and his family haven't bribed any public official nor have they given in to the extortion. This blog aims to raise awareness of due process in India. The content of this blog constitutes, opinions, observations, and publicly available documents. The intent is not to slander or defame anyone or any institution and is the manifestation of the author's right to freedom of expression – with all the protections this right guarantees.

    Get Adobe Acrobat Reader

    You will need adobe acrobat to read most of the documents. Please download adobe acrobat reader. Get Adobe Acrobat For Your System
    March 2007
    M T W T F S S
    « Jan   Apr »

    %d bloggers like this: