sc-saritasharma-judgement.pdf
Cluster Map
RSS Feed: IPC 498A
- A Note from Prof Som K Shah
- Supreme Court of India: No Automatic Arrests in 498A Cases
- Union of India Vs Mahaveer C. Singhvi (IFS) – The Devyani Khobragade String Pulling Case
- Some Things to Ponder About
- In 10 years, over 1 lakh rape accused walked free
- Understanding The 498A and DV Act Industry
- Rapes in India: The Duplicity of Ranjana Kumari of CSR
- The Pantheon of Indian Feminazis
- Indian Heroes and Indian Rogues
- The Right To Know; The Right To Live: Aruna Roy Talks About The Right To Information
Live Traffic
Recent Comments
 | Creative Escapes on What Is IPC 498A? |
 | Litem Legalis on Maintenance and Divorce Laws I… |
 | a on Sequence Of Events In A 498A… |
| top relationship exp… on Joginder Kumar Vs State Of UP… | |
| 토토사이트 이벤트 on Consequences Of Filing False 4… | |
 | Ar on What Is An Interpol Red Corner… |
 | RS Jain on 498A Counter Cases To Fight Ba… |
 | Adv.SiluMahapatra on Sequence Of Events In A 498A… |
 | Sutikkatti Dizuza on Maintenance and Divorce Laws I… |
 | Yeshwanth Rawal on Maintenance and Divorce Laws I… |
Propublica: Publc Interest Journalism
- How an Alabama Town Staved Off School Resegregation
- This Mississippi Hospital Transfers Some Patients to Jail to Await Mental Health Treatment
- Maine’s Health Department Rarely Investigates When Residents Wander Away From Their Care Facilities
- After Decades, Voters Finally OK Replacement for Crumbling Idaho School
- How Residents in a Rural Alabama County Are Confronting the Lasting Harm of Segregation Academies
- Nine Takeaways From Our Investigation Into 3M’s Forever Chemicals
- Uvalde Police Will Face More Active Shooter Training as Part of $2 Million Settlement Between City and Families
- Texas Appeals Court Orders Dismissal of Lawsuit Against ProPublica, Texas Tribune
- For the Women Who Accused the Trump Campaign of Harassment, It’s Been More Harassment
- Judge Lifts Order That Mandated Albuquerque Stop Throwing Away Homeless People’s Belongings
Copyright Notice:
The content of this blog is copyrighted. You are required to obtain prior permission before locally hosting or reproducing online or in print, any or part of the content. You are welcome to directly link to the content from your site.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.
IPC 498A 
gender biased law in india destroying indian families. DV act , maintenance u/s 125 crpc , dowery act are the weapons provided by indian law to women to use them when ever she feels appropriate , in course to harass her husband and his family or to get divorce easily whenever she wants or to extort money from her husband. But when ever man wants divorce from his wife because her cruelty or incompatiability of natue or other reason what soever is imposible in indian law because of these weapons in hands of indian women except mutual consented divorce u/s 13B.When ever husband asks for custody of his children/ child then indian law favor women by saying that mother’s lap is just like ‘child is in hands of god ‘ and duty of man is to provide economic help to wife for upbring of child and every right is given to indian women without any duty and every duty is given to man without any right.
LikeLike
Topic child custody——as per GWA 1890 and Hindu Minority & Guardianship Act 1956 Hindu father is recognized as legal guardian of male and unmarried female child in preference to mother. While considering the custody of child the paramount consideration is welfare of child. Child below 5 year of age (tender age) is preferably given to mother if child is residing with father as considering the welfare of child and without asking interest of child and saying there is no question right on child as mentioned in Indian law. When child crosses 5 year of age and time come to return the child to father then again welfare of child is again with mother as considering previously ignored factor interest of child and considering the interest of child as welfare of child.
If mother is economically sound (employed) then welfare of child is with mother and If father is economically sound and mother and child depends on father by taking maintenance from father then economic condition of parent is not deciding factor but paramount consideration is welfare of child which again lies with mother as mother can provide more love and affection to children .ultimately child will be handed over to mother by ignoring the major plus points of father and high lighting minor point of mother
LikeLike
21st May –‘World Anti Terrorism Day’
20th May — ‘Indian Anti Legal Terrorism Day’ as Hon’ble Apex court gave Judgment on 20th May 2005 and termed ‘498a’ as ‘Legal Terrorism’ in Sushil Kumar Sharma vs Union of India :JT2005(6)SC266 ; 2005(3) RCR (Criminal) 745.
LikeLike
one good news
now child custody is given to father by apex court
shaleen kabra vs shiwani kabra 8th May 2012 SC
published in supreme court cases SCC 2012 (5) 355
LikeLike
shivinder pal sangrur this judgment of custody given to father will help many victims
LikeLike
My relatives all the time say that I am killing my time here at web, except I know I am getting familiarity
all the time by reading thes nice content.
LikeLike