Archive for July 15th, 2007

US State Dept India Judicial Assistance

Here is the LINK. This link give you information on technicalities such as service of process etc. Here is an excerpt.

Summary: Judicial assistance between the United States and India is governed by the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR), 21 UST 77, TIAS 6820, 596 U.N.T.S. 261, to which the United States and India are parties and the bilateral Joint Secretary (Security), Ministry of Home Affairs, Treaty Doc. 107-3, 107th Cong., 2d Sess.

Service of Process: India is not a party to the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extra Judicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters or the Inter-American Convention on Letters Rogatory and Additional Protocol. If service of process from the United States is attempted in India by certain methods detailed in Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, such as service by mail; or service by a local agent such as a local attorney or service by publication is effected, that may not constitute service of process under Indian law. See our general Service of Process guidance. This may be important if eventual enforcement of a judgment in India is foreseen. Service may also be attempted in India pursuant to a letter rogatory, transmitted through the diplomatic channel to the Indian Ministry of External Affairs. See our guidance on preparation of letters rogatory. Letters rogatory for service of process should be transmitted to the U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Overseas Citizens Services, Office of American Citizens Services and Crisis Management, Near East and South Central Asia Division, CA/OCS/ACS/NESCA. Mailing address: SA-29, 4th Floor, 2201 C Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20520. Express mail address: 2100 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037.See also our Service Under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) feature and FSIA Checklist for questions about service on a foreign state, agency or instrumentality.

_______________________________________________

Cat Fight In AP Women’s Commission: Mary Ravindranath Vs Padmaja Reddy

Folks,

Here is some tabloid material. It looks like the leaders of the Womens Commission of AP, Mary Ravindranath and Padmaja Reddy got into a cat fight.

Mary Ravindranath

Here is the video of this cat fight.  — Unfortunately it’s gone

You can read about their ruckus here,  or click here for the pdf.

These are the officials who are supposed to look after the welfare of women! Nice. They may want start by learning about something called professionalism.

Here is a corroboration of the allegations of her slapping people: Hindu article

Click here’s the jpg of the same article.

So much about being a Christian and respecting the tenets of Christianity — which include not slapping people around!  Also, her husband is wanted by the CBI in a cheating case. (Link is unfortunately dead, so here’s the pdf)

I am sure that she is proud of him as she dons the mantle of a true congresswoman now that her hubby is involved in a corruption case.

Last I heard, the CM of AP had asked both these women to resign after this disgusting cat fight in public.

_______________________________________________


Visitors Since Mar/14/07

  • 3,404,930

Cluster Map

Live Traffic

Archives

Top Rated Posts

Some Interesting Stats On Arrests Of Women

In 1930, the British govt arrested 17,000 women for their involvement in the Dandi Yatra (Salt March). During 1937 to 1947 (10 Years), they arrested 5,000 women involved in the freedom struggle. From 2004 to 2006, the govt of India arrested 90,000 women of all ages under 498A. On the average, 27,000 women per year are being arrested under this flawed law. These are stats from the NCRB.

Copyright Notice:

The content of this blog is copyrighted. You are required to obtain prior permission before locally hosting or reproducing online or in print, any or part of the content. You are welcome to directly link to the content from your site. Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape MyFreeCopyright.com Registered & Protected Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.

Disclaimer:

The family of the writer was tortured by the Indian Police in an attempt to extort over a $100,000 by holding them in custody for over a week. The police, in cahoots with the magistrate and the PP, did this due to the ridiculous allegations made in a 498A case by his embittered ex-wife. She filed the case years after he and his family had last seen her. Thousands of 498A cases are filed each year in India by women seeking to wreak vengeance on their husbands and in-laws. Enormous sums are extorted from intimidated families implicated in these cases by corrupt Indian police officers and elements of the Indian judiciary. The author and his family haven't bribed any public official nor have they given in to the extortion. This blog aims to raise awareness of due process in India. The content of this blog constitutes, opinions, observations, and publicly available documents. The intent is not to slander or defame anyone or any institution and is the manifestation of the author's right to freedom of expression – with all the protections this right guarantees.

Get Adobe Acrobat Reader

You will need adobe acrobat to read most of the documents. Please download adobe acrobat reader. Get Adobe Acrobat For Your System
July 2007
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031