Adv Pradeep Nawani has shown us the way on how to go about nailing the scum that infest the ranks of the Indian police and has also shown us to how to nail the bitter half and her enablers under Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3 (DP3).
Here is the coverage in the news. This is reproduced from DNA India:
NEW DELHI: A Noida court has ordered police to book a woman and her parents for giving dowry. The chief judicial magistrate (CJM) of Noida ordered the police to register an FIR against Noida-based call centre employee Natasha Juyal and her parents under section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act (DPA) for giving dowry. The CJM also ordered action against police officers who refused to register Natasha’s husband Namit Juyal’s complaint.
Giving or taking dowry is a criminal offence under Section 3 of the DPA with imprisonment. This is a rare case where the section was evoked against a woman and her family.
Namit’s lawyer Pradeep Nawani argued that Natasha had not only accepted to giving dowry, but also submitted a list of stridhan that was not as per the DPA. Even her claim of huge wedding expense did not match her father’s financial capacity.
According to Nawani, Natasha filed a complaint of dowry harassment in Noida’s sector-20 police station last year, saying Namit was given Rs10 lakh as dowry in 2005.
The Noida police arrested Namit and packed him off to Dasna jail in UP. After getting bail, Namit sought information under RTI from the Noida police, seeking to know on what basis he was arrested.
He was horrified to hear that he was arrested on the basis of his wife’s mere written complaint and verbal statement with no records to back her allegations. He then asked police to register a complaint against his wife and family for giving dowry.
On refusal by the police, he approached court to get a complaint registered against his wife and her parents. He also sought contempt of court action against the police for failing to comply with a supreme court order, stipulating that refusing to register police complaint by a husband in a dowry case is tantamount to the contempt of court.
Here are the orders: 
____________________________________________
IPC 498A 
Well done pradeep. Case for giving dowry will ensure 498a IPC misuse will be effectively curbed.
LikeLike
If the intent is to stop the social menace of Dowry then both givers and takers must be booked simultaneously. Bride’s parents cannot go away scot free for promoting Dowry and yet demand that the takers be punished. If the husband’s family is convicted then the bride’s family must join them in going to jail for the illegal activity. On the other hand if the allegations are proven to be false then the husband’s family must be liberally compensated for the time, money and associated defamation and damages.
LikeLike
Great…
LikeLike
very very good job pradeep, well done.
LikeLike
well done pradeep.I wish you could help me and others as well because some corrupted lawer are mis using our situation.
LikeLike
i congrate you pradeep,i hope with this decession a lot of family will get relieaf,well done,it will be a great help to many more in fact some corrupted lawyer misuse the law and situation
LikeLike
Well done pradeep. A great job done by you.U created a history.
Can u please make available the copy of FIR. The above Document is court orders directing the police officials to register the FIR.
Actually i want the copy of fIR to see how the matter has been presented in an effective way.
Please post it on Mynation or can send on my mail ID.
Thanks and regards
kamal
LikeLike
WELL DONE PRADEEP.
I AM AN ADVOCATE AT GHAZIABAD U.P.I GOT MARRIED MY COUSIN,A LAWYER IN CIVIL AT KHURJA,TO THE DAUGHTER OF AN ASST.SUB.INSP.THE GIRL IS OF BAD NATURE AND CORRUPT.SHE LEFT THE HOME AFTER FIVE MONTHS ONLY AND LODGED A CASE UNDER 498A,323,504,506.3/4 D.P.ACT.
KINDLY PROVIDE ME ALL THE DETAILS AND ADVISE
ARUN
LikeLike
Bravo Pradeep.
Sounds good and took off a lto of load from my head.
I will surely look in the DP3 to nail down the in laws of my brother.
Please keep the good things up.
Thanks and regards
Ar. Ashish K. Kaushik
LikeLike
well done bro,
i cant tell you how happy i am for you, excellent work. keep it up and i wish u all the very best in your future cases.
thanks!
vijay k nawani
Maun, Botswana, southern africa
LikeLike
Well done Boss,
Yes. I too suffer from wife and in-laws threatening, who are living presently at Delhi, in a different manner on a regular basis, in order to swindle our hard-earned income and property, by misusing newly formulated laws specially designed only for women. The law makers fully forgetting the constitutions article 14 which says all men and woman are equal before law or say equality before law. This article 14 giving equal strength to man and woman but formulating new law for women so for no law formulated by the law makers for men. Why?
Which only resulted in iron hand cuffing like a herded criminal and lying in illegal custody. I had been caught by the police on 29th Jan 2009, and kept for two days in police lockup and six day in Correctional Home, Tihar jail and released on bail. She filed false FIR’s and filed under section 498A, 406,506,323 & 34 IPC against me & my family members (my patents, 2 brothers and 1 bhabhi).we all got the bail from the Court of Judicial Magistrate at delhi on 5th Feb,2009. Now, no one here to help me from this day to day harassment, lost couple of good jobs.
Kindly provide me all the documents and also guideness or advice.
Thanx & Regards
Raj
LikeLike
Sir, One important point in our fight against misuse of Secton 498S is to request for die-detector, narco-analysis and brain mapping of both the complainant and the accused. For, when this draconian amendmenet was brought about in the early 1970s, investigative tools like lie detector, narco analysis, etc. were very much in its infancy, and not seldom ued. Now, it is under use, in major cases like that of Karim Telgi, terrorists, etc. One method of keeping false complainants at bay is to give the option of asking for lie detector test of both the complainant and accused. At the time of FIR the complainant should give her consent to undergo lie detector; she can also demand a similar test on the offender. This, in my opinion, will put the fear of God on both. The suggestions made by Justice Kapoor, unfortunately, does not include this, may be because it falls under CRPC and not IPC. However, civil society can plead to the Law Minister (hopefully Bharadwah) to allow this.
Please intimate the opinion of the legal fraternity on my suggestion.
LikeLike
It is a right action and very much needed like in India.
LikeLike
HI !
please send me if possible the F.I.R copy and the phone number of the advocate Mr. Pradeep Nawani.
Hope you understand my situation.
Best Regards,
Arun
LikeLike
Hi Arun,
Did you get the phone number of the lawyer if yes , please pass the same to prabhukeerthik@gmail.com
LikeLike
Hi, prabhu,
Pleaase send the phne nummber of mr. Pradeep nawani at vishalkapur@hotmail.com urgently.
LikeLike
Good job Pradeep. can you provide us your mobile number so that I can seek some information from you on the same. I am also a innocent victim of 498a
Thanks
Amol
LikeLike
A GREAT GREAT GOOD JOB DONE, REALLY I DONT HAVE WORDS TO PRAISE YOU.YOU HAVE PLACED ASOLID KICK ON ASSHOLES OF SUCKER 498A WIFE AND HER …………
I TOO HAVE A 498A WIFE,GOT BAIL AND NOW FACING TRIAL, I WISH I HAVE A PROFESSIONAL LIKE YOU TO STAND WITH ME IN COURT SO THAT THE SAME COULD BE REPEATED ONCE AGAIN!!
COULD YOU PLEASE GIVE ME UR MONO. SO AS TO CONTACT YOU
LikeLike
WELL DONE BRO
IT MAY NOT BE USED BY DIRTY PEOPLE BUT FOR INNOCENT PARRENTS
WHO DEDICATED ALL THE LIFE TO EDUCATE THEIR CHILDRENS AND ONLY PRAY 4 THEIR WELL BEING .EVEN BEING TREATED BADLY BY D-I-L
AND STILL SPEND LAST PHASE OF LIFE IN THREAT OF POLICE CASE.
I DONO THE CASE BUT IN A MIDDLE CLASS FAMILY GOING TO JAIL
AT THIS STAGE/AGE IS WORST THEN HELL
WISH U BEST OF LUCK FOR FUTURE
B. NAWANI
LikeLike
HI !
please send me if possible the F.I.R copy and the phone number of the advocate Mr. Pradeep Nawani.
Hope you understand my situation.
Best Regards,
GOPAL
LikeLike
welldone pradeep nawani. a great job done by you .U created a history. please send me if possible the fir copy namit v/s natasha u/s 156(3) $ other order passed by metropolitan magistrate neeraj gaur observe that giving dowary was a cognisable offence and directed the SHO of model town police station to register an fir. this order printed from THE TIMES OF INDIA NOW, Bride and kin in dock for dowry DATED 7 JUN 2009.and the phone number of the advocate Mr. pradeep nawani.
Hope you understand my situation.
Best Regards,
PRASOON VASHISHTHA
LikeLike
thank you sir,
LikeLike
regard
manoj kumar juyal
LikeLike
thanks sir for ur great work
LikeLike
Good job Pradeep.
But , throw some light on the subject that do you have to register an FIR at the place of marriage ( city ) or it can be lodged any where
LikeLike
you call me i can help unconditionally and without any money. I will guide you all that is done by court.
Thanks,
Sonu 9959728628
LikeLike
this is the great job. well done sir.
i am also a victim of false 498a
sir please sand me the photo copy of fir against woman in noida and the contact no. of pardeep nawani sir
i will be very thankful to u.
vijay nagpal (haryana)
LikeLike
Sonu Lall
Bravo Pradeep! I want Nawani’s phone no if u can help. Kindly call on 9959728628. Your little help could be a gr8 for me. My case is recently in gzb court. dated 07/10/2010.
LikeLike
Well done Pradeep
LikeLike
There should be provision of Camera Recordings as well – In Police Stations and More Importantly Courts – At times rather most of the times There are many things said verbally by the Complainant and vested interest advocates/Parents/Near and Dear Ones to Prejudice the Court- Mislead the Court; without any written statement.; against the husband and his family members. If Camera Recordings are available;One can take up – as to how Misleading False Oral Statements were made, how the husband was not heard in the Police Station and How the Submissions made by husband was not heard/considered during court proceedings….
LikeLike
Well Done Brother…. It is a first step and necessary action that should be taken…….
In order to stop the dowry cases and to stop misuse of dowry cases 498A….
LikeLike
you call me i can help unconditionally and without any money. I will guide you all that is done by court.
Thanks,
Sonu 9959728628
LikeLike
तुम लोग को कानुन नही कैदी ही वयवसथा को हॉथ मे लेकर सजा दे सकता है जैसे राम सिंह को निरभया केस मे मिला
LikeLike
you call me i can help unconditionally and without any money. I will guide you all that is done by court.
Thanks,
Sonu 9959728628
LikeLike
Hi Dear All,
Mr. Nawani was my legal advisor and because of his greed for money i was jailed for 2 days in dasna jai gzb. My case 17th month of Mutual divorce petition and then 125 and 498A,323,504 and 506.
so please be aware. It is all about money call me and i can tell 9959728628. I know after some days this will also get deleted by the owner. Hence dont judge everyone because of blog.
Thanks,
Sonu
LikeLike
Hi Dear all,
Pradeep nawani is still my lawyer and fighting in court for me. If anything derogatory written about him. Please excuse because i was not in the right state of mind becuase of these fradulent cases. Request you all to kindly do not consider my above stated words. Pleading sorry for same.
thanks,
sonu lall
LikeLike
recheck it is done.
On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 15:22:18 +0530 IPC 498A wrote > #mailMsgBodyContainer a:hover { color: red; } #mailMsgBodyContainer a.primaryactionlink:link,#mailMsgBodyContainer a.primaryactionlink:visited { background-color: #2585B2; color: #fff; } #mailMsgBodyContainer a.primaryactionlink:hover,#mailMsgBodyContainer a.primaryactionlink:active { background-color: #11729E !important; color: #fff !important; } #mailMsgBodyContainer .post { min-width: 700px !important; } WordPress.com
sonu commented: “Hi Dear all,
Pradeep nawani is still my lawyer and fighting in court for me. If anything derogatory written about him. Please excuse because i was not in the right state of mind becuase of these fradulent cases. Request you all to kindly do not conside”
LikeLike
It is shame on you Mr Eric, Firstly you posted the contents about Mr Nawani from a duplicate name i.e Sonu , Please maintain the dignity and do not post such defamatory contents on public platforms to settle your personal score , Mr Nawani also fought my cases in Karkardooma court with great passion and desperation and I got free of cost divorce from my wife but people like you intentionally trying to defame him. Do not behave like those girls who files 498A.
LikeLike
Dear all , Mobile Number of Mr Pradeep Nawani ,Advocate is 09910003298.
LikeLike
Mr. Roshan you better mind your bussiness.
LikeLike
Very nice job Pradeep ji. can i have your contact number i also have a fake case which i want to give you…
LikeLike
my wife case me and my father mother and sister against in sdjm court what i do
LikeLike