Excerpts From Bail Orders And Judgments

I compiled a very short list of excerpts of what the courts around the country are saying about 498A and the impact on right to liberty.

Before I go on, here is what the spokesperson for NCW has to say about amending 498A:
“The idea should be to see how the police system works, the concerned official out there should not lodge an FIR and arrest the groom and his side before investigating. These kind of shortcuts are mainly tainting the image of the prevailing law. The way uncles, aunts are also humiliated is not fair, we agree that they should not be booked until a full-proof investigation is carried out. Instead of amending the law we should try to improve our police system and investigating procedure,”

These excerpts below and in the accompanying pdf file are from Judis.nic.in. I attempted to find more from judgments from other courts, but it looks like the Supreme Court and the Delhi High Court are the two courts whose officers appear to do a great job in making the bail orders and judgments available online. These excerpts are pretty funny and they throw some light upon the idiocy that is this law. Here are some gems:

  • “The appellant has also filed a maintenance petition against her husband. What can she possibly get by prosecuting him as well as his family members? The appellant filed the criminal case under Section 498A etc. not only against her husband but also against her husband’s father, mother, brother, sister, etc. In exercise of our discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned Judgment of the High Court quashing the criminal case filed by the appellant. After all, the appellant will not get any benefit by sending her husband or his family members to jail. She is pursuing her maintenance case, and if she is so advised she can also file a suit for damages, which if filed will be decided on its own merits.”

-The Supreme Court Of India, Appeal (crl.) 188 of 2007, 12/02/2007

  • The sole purpose of a novel like story evolved by the informant and recited in her First Information Report is to take a revenge with him by getting him sent to jail and further placing him in sufferings with his eventual suspension. The Courts are to protect the valuable rights of not only a wife if she is victimized and maltreated with dowry demand but also a harassed husband who is also equal in the eyes of law and if a concocted attempt as the one in hand is made to place the husband in an awkward situation, certainly the Court must come to the rescue of such a husband in humiliation.”

-Allahabad HC, Writ Petition MB 528 of 2005, 10/01/2006

  • “Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. can be resorted to, in order to secure the ends of justice; it can be used, in given circumstances, to quash criminal proceedings. Lately, a tendency has emerged to set the criminal law into motion, either to settle scores, or to seek quick fix solutions to essentially civil disputes. This has been deprecated by the Supreme Court, (G. Sagar Suri Vs. State of U.P. AIR 2000 SC 754; Indian Oil Corporation Vs. NEPC Ltd., 2006(6) SCC 736) which has held that in such cases, the Court should invoke its power and quash criminal proceedings.”

-Justice Ravindra Bhat , Delhi HC, CRL.M.(C) No.5264/2005, 30.03.2007

  • “The criminal case against her in which she was accused was compounded by the petitioner on the basis of compromise. She is living with her husband. She wants to use criminal justice as a tool against the petitioners who are her sister-in-laws and mother-in-law. She wants to enjoy the company of the husband keeping other relatives on tenterhooks.

-Delhi HC, Crl. M.C. No. 8188-90/2006, 28.03.2007

Here are the rest of these gems in the pdf: Excerpts From Bail Orders And Judgments

_______________________________________________________

Advertisements

4 Responses to “Excerpts From Bail Orders And Judgments”


  1. 2 kamlesh January 23, 2009 at 1:04 pm

    pl send deatail to protect women act 125

    mere wife ne muze nokere se nikal wa diya kake paker ke juthe case kar diye . phir bhi mintence mag raghe he

    pl. deatail to save

    Like

  2. 3 DEV RAJ February 13, 2012 at 4:25 pm

    This act is baseless, useless and only horrer and terror. This act is terrorist and warrior for currupt women and her currupt family member. Any family who has brain always oppose this act. This is a black spot and black act for my country and constitution. A low knowledge law maker and political vote bank make this black law. All family has men and women, what is the meaning of this law and why this law.

    Like

    • 4 Ssa July 13, 2014 at 3:00 pm

      You are right. The hon’ble SC and the HIgh courts have rightly called 498A as ‘ Legal Terrorism ‘ and Draconian Law, in view of it’s wide misuse ! It is indeed a fallacy in the name of gender equality, protection of women… How can all men and all the women of the male life partner be presumed to be demons and murders while the other side innocent victims ! Let this one sided and blind law be amended suitably . Till then, hon’ble judiciary should protect our life and liberty…

      Like


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Visitors Since Mar/14/07

  • 3,130,574

Cluster Map

Live Traffic

Archives

Top Rated Posts

Some Interesting Stats On Arrests Of Women

In 1930, the British govt arrested 17,000 women for their involvement in the Dandi Yatra (Salt March). During 1937 to 1947 (10 Years), they arrested 5,000 women involved in the freedom struggle. From 2004 to 2006, the govt of India arrested 90,000 women of all ages under 498A. On the average, 27,000 women per year are being arrested under this flawed law. These are stats from the NCRB.

Copyright Notice:

The content of this blog is copyrighted. You are required to obtain prior permission before locally hosting or reproducing online or in print, any or part of the content. You are welcome to directly link to the content from your site. Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape MyFreeCopyright.com Registered & Protected Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.

Disclaimer:

The family of the writer was tortured by the Indian Police in an attempt to extort over a $100,000 by holding them in custody for over a week. The police, in cahoots with the magistrate and the PP, did this due to the ridiculous allegations made in a 498A case by his embittered ex-wife. She filed the case years after he and his family had last seen her. Thousands of 498A cases are filed each year in India by women seeking to wreak vengeance on their husbands and in-laws. Enormous sums are extorted from intimidated families implicated in these cases by corrupt Indian police officers and elements of the Indian judiciary. The author and his family haven't bribed any public official nor have they given in to the extortion. This blog aims to raise awareness of due process in India. The content of this blog constitutes, opinions, observations, and publicly available documents. The intent is not to slander or defame anyone or any institution and is the manifestation of the author's right to freedom of expression – with all the protections this right guarantees.

Get Adobe Acrobat Reader

You will need adobe acrobat to read most of the documents. Please download adobe acrobat reader. Get Adobe Acrobat For Your System
October 2007
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

%d bloggers like this: