Allahabad HC-No Arbitrary Arrests In Cognizable Cases – 2004

Here is a judgment by Justice Markandeya Katju while he was serving as a judge of the Allahabad HC.
He says:
“After the promulgation of the Constitution individual liberty has become of great importance particularly in view of Article 21, which is a fundamental right. Hence it cannot be lightly interfered with. Moreover, section 157(1) Cr.P.C. States :-

“157. Procedure for investigation – (1) If, from information received or otherwise, an officer in charge of a police station has reason to suspect the commission of an offence which he is empowered under section 156 to investigate, he shall forthwith send a report of the same to a Magistrate empowered to take cognizance of such offence upon a police report and shall proceed in person, or shall depute one of his subordinate officer not being below such rank as the State Government may, by general or special order, prescribe in this behalf to proceed, to the spot to investigate the facts and circumstances of the case and if necessary to take measures for the discovery and arrest of the offender.”

The above provision clearly shows that it is not necessary to arrest in every case wherever a FIR of cognizable offence has been registered. No doubt investigation has to be made in every case where a cognizable offence is disclosed but in our opinion investigation does not necessarily include arrest. Often the investigation can be done without arresting a person, and this legal position becomes clear from section 157(1) of the Cr.P.C. because that provision states that the Police Officer has to investigate the case, and, if necessary, to take measures for the arrest of the offender. The use of words ‘ if necessary’ clearly indicates that the Police Officer does not have to arrest in every case wherever FIR has been lodged and this position has been clarified in Joginder Kumar’s case (supra).

In our country unfortunately whenever an FIR of a cognizable offence is lodged the police immediately goes to arrest the accused. This practice in our opinion is illegal as it s against the decision of the Supreme Court in Joginder Kumar’s case, and it is also in violation of Article 21 of theConstitution as well as section 157 (1) Cr.P.C. No doubt section 157(1) Cr.P.C. gives a police officer discretion to arrest or not, but this discretion cannot be exercised arbitrarily and it must be exercised in accordance with the principles laid down in Joginder Kumar’s case (supra).”

Here is the judgment: Allahabad HC-No Arbitrary Arrests In Cognizable Cases

_____________________________________________________

Role Of Judiciary In Good Governance: Former CJI YK Sabharwal

Here is the pdf:

http://www.supremecourtofindia.nic.in/new_links/Good%20Governance.pdf

____________________________________

Taking Liberties: An Article By Joginder Singh, Former Director, CBI

Here is the link to the article in the Hindu. This draws from Joginder Kumar Vs State of UP.

http://thehindu.com/thehindu/op/2002/02/12/stories/2002021200030100.htm 

_____________________________________________

Express Article On The Oncoming Marriage Squeeze For Indian Men

Here is the link:

http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/India-set-for-the-marriage-squeeze-UN/233685/

Here is an excerpt:

“At the greatest risk are elite women and destitute men, study points out. “The former may not find available grooms in the proper stratum, while the latter may not be able to attract even the poorest women, aspiring to marry into better households.”

__________________________________________

 

Wife Summoned For Falsifying Evidence In Maintenance Case

Here is the link: Woman summoned for false evidence in divorce case

__________________________________